Motion: 'drug consumption rooms should be available to everybody with an addiction problem'

For...

You need to establish rapport before you can talk about the substance use and its treatment. If there is no rapport then there is no point to any kind of intervention; service users will not take in anything that is said to them, they will probably dislike their practitioner, and are likely to drop out.

Against...

Establishing rapport is important and needs to be part of dealing with the problem the service user wants help with. It is no good wasting time just trying to strike up some rapport. Service users want to know that they are going to get the help they need and that their practitioner has that as their focus.

For... Drug consumption rooms are a form of harm reduction. Harm reduction is important at all stages of the recovery journey. To be able to take drugs in a safe environment, especially if there is also some access to basic health care, is a significant step in preventing serious consequences and costs from drug use. Against... Providing drug users with a safe place to take drugs and some guidance on using may make motivating for change more difficult. The general public object to tax-payers' money being spent on expensive units which are seen to encourage continued drug use and drug dealing around the facility. Any discussion of substance use related harms begs the question ‘Can the harm be reduced?’ Harm reduction tends to be controversial because the balance between the benefits and the disadvantages is often unclear. Read the article cited below, which reviews the evidence for supervised injecting facilities and drug consumption rooms and see what general principles for judging a harm reduction strategy you can draw out. Summary of key findings... The researchers report on i) drug-related harms, ii) access to substance use treatment and other health services, iii) impact on the local drug injecting population, iv) impact on public drug use, drug-related crime and violence. There has not been a cost-effectiveness analysis. Health outcomes from a 5yr perspective A 35% decrease in ambulance attendances for opioid related problems (there was a general decrease in the area but not so marked). An increase from 38% to 61% experiencing an overdose, and a 7% increase in those injecting daily. 32% more engaged with drug treatment services and 40% more with primary health care. 48% were getting health care for the first time. 77% had at least one period of stopping injecting. Community outcomes from a 5yr perspective Witnessing injecting in the community was reported down from 33% to 19% by local residents and 38% to 28% for businesses. There was a corresponding reduction in discarded drug use paraphernalia but no reduction in the offers to buy street drugs. Find the full text of the article here… Tran V, Reid SE, Roxburgh A and Day CA (2021) Assessing Drug Consumption Rooms and Longer Term (5 Year) Impacts on Community and Clients. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 14: 4639-4647  doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S244720 Decide which side of the debate you support and then Make Your Own Case